Picture this scenario if you can:
you are running a relatively young company in a fiercely competitive
marketplace where the norm is feverish change. Suddenly, in the midst of a
firestorm, your CEO leaves you or even worse you are having to ask him to go.
Where does that leave your organization? To even mature organizations, such
sudden exits can be deeply unsettling. For smaller businesses it may be a death
blow.
Take Twitter for instance which,
even before Elon Musk, has not been a stranger to leadership upheavals. When
CEO Dick Colosto left the engine room of the microblogging giant on a short
2-week notice, he left a potentially disruptive vacuum at the top. Only, it’s
founder Jack Dorsey by taking over as “interim CEO” ensured that Twitter
absorbed the shock without so much as a twitch of a muscle.
From behemoths like Twitter to small
startups all across the world, Interim CEOs or CXO’s have helped steer
businesses through the rough waters of turbulent leadership change. According
to a Harvard Business Review report 17 % of successions at publicly traded
firms between 1996 and 1998 included the appointment of an interim CEO for at
least 45 days. “They don’t stay long. The vast majority of interim CEOs
stay for at least a quarter (92%), but just a third of them stay on for more
than a year.”
However, for as long as they
stay, Interim CEOs do play a critical role, ensuring unruffled continuity in
the face of change, which in many cases may be in fact crucial for a company’s
future. In essence, the concept of Interim CEOs / Interim CXO’s has gained
ground not just because it helps companies weather turbulence. The concept
delivers several clear advantages, says the HBR report including allowing a
company take an objective and unbiased look at hiring a new CEO. Says the
report: “The appointment of an Interim CEO / CXO, makes it easier to search for
a new chief executive unencumbered by the interests and biases of the old CEO /
CXO. Sitting executives can exert influence on the search for a replacement,
often in order to preserve their own legacy.”
Three former interim CEOs
interviewed by HBR researchers felt that instead of attempting big long-term
strategic manoeuvres, interim CEOs remain focused on “short-term, tactical
crisis management.” And there lies their unique value, particularly for
companies that may need immediate trauma care more than long term
therapy. Besides this, Interim CEOs offer organizations three major
advantages:
BIGGER IMPACT
Since their appointment by its very
definition is for short terms, interims are very delivery-outcome focused. They
tend to be not only self-driven but also self sufficient, or in other words, as
described by the authors of a paper published by Senior Management Worldwide,
they are “their own business and marketing departments.” Clearly, to stay
robust and resilient nothing rates higher for a business than achieving its
goals efficiently. “The best way to market yourself is by demonstrating
successful outcomes. And Interim CEOs, because of the very nature of their
briefs, tend to do this really well.”
In a manner of speaking,
interims assume charge with a clear-cut mandate, which, to put it simply, is to
make a visible difference in a short amount of time, unlike a permanent
business executive for whom speed may not be a primary priority. Therefore,
“they tend to deliver more goals than permanent executives or
employees would do in the same duration.”
MEASURABLE RETURNS
Every minute an interim executive
spends in an organization is measured by returns, or in other words
results that can be expressed in cold numbers. It’s the very nature of the
beast: a calling that cuts no slack and leaves no room for indolence. Because
of this, interims are able “to deliver measurable results that give visible
proof of their value.”
INTERIM EQUAL SAVINGS
Quite often interim managers are
more experienced in delivering at a higher level than permanent executives.
This allows them to spot issues objectively and fill in the gaps that leak both
time, money and resources. They add value to organizations by making it
efficient, saving companies big hoards of cash.
Says an HBR report: “Interim executives work extra hard and put in extra hours. It’s not unusual for them to be the last ones leaving the office or staying in late to make sure everything is ready for the next day.” For many companies, such laser focus on the here and now may make the crucial difference between riding or drowning in the tempest of change.
Comments
Post a Comment